Bill · H.Res. 303· House(119-HRES-303)
Recognizing that members and affiliates of Tren de Aragua are alien enemies perpetrating an invasion of the United States and affirming that the President is exercising his constitutional authority to repel that invasion.
- Introduced
- 4/8/2025
- Last activity
- 4/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Andy Biggs
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes Tren de Aragua as a terrorist organization that is perpetrating an invasion of the United States. It identifies members and affiliates of this group as alien enemies. The document asserts that these actions are happening both directly and at the direction of the Maduro regime in Venezuela. Furthermore, the resolution affirms that the President is exercising constitutional and legal authority to repel this invasion. This authority includes the power to apprehend, restrain, secure, and remove these individuals from the country.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this give the federal government more power?+7
The resolution affirms the President's expansive constitutional authority to act against perceived invasions.
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?+5
The resolution treats Tren de Aragua as a terrorist organization, emphasizing counter-terrorism efforts.
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The resolution facilitates the removal of individuals deemed to be part of an invasion, which proponents argue enhances border security.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would immigrants be better off under this?-8
The designation of members as alien enemies significantly increases the risk of apprehension and removal for non-naturalized individuals.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?-7
The targeting of a Venezuelan group may disproportionately impact Hispanic/Latino populations.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-6
The use of the Alien Enemies Act allows for the apprehension and removal of individuals without traditional due process.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Safety of the American people: The resolution states that removing alien enemies engaged in an invasion is necessary for the safety of the American people (Whereas clause regarding removal).
-
Repelling an invasion: The resolution affirms the President's authority to repel an invasion by members and affiliates of Tren de Aragua (Resolution section 3).
-
Addressing violent crime: The text cites various violent acts, such as the murder of Laken Hope Riley and assaults on law enforcement officers, as reasons for the recognition of the group as an invading force (Whereas clauses regarding specific criminal acts).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Apprehension and removal of individuals: Under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, males of the age of fourteen years and upwards who are not naturalized can be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed (Whereas clause regarding the Alien Enemies Act of 1798).
-
Targeting of members and affiliates: The resolution recognizes members and affiliates of Tren de Aragua as alien enemies subject to these actions (Resolution sections 2 and 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Counter Terrorism Funding+5Increases Domestic Surveillance+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For White Americans+4Good For Urban Residents+3Good For Women+3Good For Immigrants-8Good For Hispanic Americans-7
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+7Improves Due Process-6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5Improves Pathway To Citizenship-5
- 4/8/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin