Bill · H.Res. 142· House(119-HRES-142)
Recognizing the 80th anniversary of the amphibious landing on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima during World War II and the raisings of the flag of the United States on Mount Suribachi.
- Introduced
- 2/18/2025
- Last activity
- 2/18/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Ken Calvert
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the 80th anniversary of the amphibious landing on the Japanese island of Iwo Jima during World War II. It details the historical context of the 36-day battle that began on February 19, 1945, including the strategic importance of the island's airfields. The text highlights the flag raisings on Mount Suribachi on February 23, 1945, and the immense casualties suffered by both United States and Japanese forces. Furthermore, the bill honors the servicemembers who fought, notes the Medals of Honor awarded, and mentions the commemorative events planned for 2025. Finally, the measure officially commemorates the anniversary, honors the veterans and fallen servicemembers, and reaffirms the friendship between the United States and Japan.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+7
The resolution provides formal recognition, veneration, and encouragement for public ceremonies to honor these veterans.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
The resolution honors the service and sacrifice of those who participated in the battle, many of whom are now seniors.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+5
The resolution encourages the public to honor and venerate the veterans of the Battle of Iwo Jima through ceremonies and programs.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Honor and Recognition for Veterans and Servicemembers: The resolution formally honors the marines, sailors, soldiers, army air crew, and coast guardsmen who fought bravely at Iwo Jima, as well as current servicemembers, which provides official national recognition for their service and sacrifice as outlined in Resolved paragraphs (3) and (9).
-
Encouraging National Commemoration: The text encourages the people of the United States to honor the veterans of the Battle of Iwo Jima with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities, which fosters community appreciation and historical remembrance as stated in Resolved paragraph (8).
-
Strengthening International Relations: The resolution reaffirms the bonds of friendship between the United States and Japan, which promotes peaceful international relations and shared commemorative efforts as noted in Resolved paragraph (7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences, burdens, or adverse impacts for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+7Good For Seniors+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+5Improves Veterans Benefits+5
- 7/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York