Bill · H.Res. 1210· House(119-HRES-1210)
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) nuclear security role.
- Introduced
- 4/23/2026
- Last activity
- 4/23/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Foster
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives in support of the International Atomic Energy Agency's nuclear security role. It notes that the IAEA helps countries develop and use nuclear technology for peaceful purposes and plays a critical part in global nuclear security. The text highlights that rogue regimes and clandestine organizations seek nuclear materials for weapons. Because the IAEA Office of Nuclear Security relies mostly on unpredictable voluntary funding, the resolution seeks to address this need. It encourages the United States and other member states to provide the resources necessary for the IAEA to fulfill its duties.
Yes· 3 of 30
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+7
Supports multilateral cooperation through the IAEA to strengthen global nuclear security.
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+7
Promotes ministerial meetings and international collaboration on nuclear safety.
Would children be better off under this?+5
Prevents nuclear proliferation and radiological threats to future generations.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-1
Encouraging increased financial contributions to the IAEA may increase government spending.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1
The resolution encourages the U.S. to provide more resources and financial support to the IAEA.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-1
Calls for more funding without specifying budget offsets.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Strengthening global nuclear security and safety: The resolution maintains that the IAEA plays an indispensable role in these areas (Section 1).
-
Preventing the spread of nuclear weapons: The text reaffirms that the United States has a vital interest in securing nuclear materials and preventing weapon spread (Section 2).
-
Promoting political commitment: The resolution encourages supporting the IAEA in convening ministerial meetings on nuclear security (Section 3A).
-
Implementation of the Nuclear Security Plan: It encourages providing reliable and sufficient resources to implement this plan (Section 3B).
-
Financial support for nuclear protection: The resolution suggests providing political, technical, and financial support to the Nuclear Security Fund, which assists countries in protecting nuclear and radiological materials and facilities (Section 3C).
-
Encouraging private sector involvement: It encourages developing a strategy to bring in non-state, private sector contributions to the Nuclear Security Fund (Section 3D).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+5Good For Asian Americans+5Good For Billionaires+5Good For Children+5Good For High Income Households+5Good For High Net Worth Individuals+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Immigrants+5Good For L G B T Q Community+5Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Men+5Good For Middle Aged+5Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Native Americans+5Good For People With Disabilities+5Good For Retirees+5Good For Rural Residents+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Students+5Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+5Good For Urban Residents+5Good For White Americans+5Good For Women+5Good For Young Adults+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+7Improves International Alliances+7Increases Counter Terrorism Funding+5Increases Foreign Aid+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility-1Reduces Government Spending-1Reduces National Debt-1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+2
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/23/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan