Bill · H.R. 9959· House(119-HR-9959)
Green New Deal for Public Schools Act
- Introduced
- 7/27/2026
- Last activity
- 7/27/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Pramila Jayapal
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill establishes the Green New Deal for Public Schools Act to upgrade public school facilities and support educational equity. It creates grant programs funded by mandatory appropriations to modernize school buildings, improve energy efficiency, and remove environmental hazards. The legislation provides resources to hire additional educators, mental health professionals, and support staff while lowering student-to-staff ratios. It also funds programs focused on climate change resiliency, community partnerships, and hands-on learning opportunities for students. Additionally, the bill mandates increased federal funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act over a ten-year period.
Yes· 3 of 39
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+10
The bill provides mandatory funding increases and protects accessibility in school design.
Does this put more money into public schools?+10
The bill provides massive new funding for public schools and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Would children be better off under this?+9
The bill directly improves school safety, nutrition, and environments for students.
The opposite
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-2
The bill explicitly prohibits using funds for measures that unduly surveil students.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Healthier and Safer School Facilities: Under Section 102, eligible schools can receive grants to conduct healthy green retrofits that eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, remove contaminants like asbestos and lead, and improve indoor air and water quality. This creates safer and more comfortable learning environments for students and staff.
-
Expanded Support Staff and Lower Ratios: Under Section 103, resource block grants allow local educational agencies to hire full-time educators, mental health professionals, counselors, and social workers. This provision aims to achieve target student-to-staff ratios and increase access to essential student support services.
-
Mandatory Special Education Funding: Under Section 105, the bill amends the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide substantial mandatory appropriations from fiscal years 2027 through 2036 and beyond. This significantly increases federal financial support for special education and related services for children with disabilities.
-
Local Job Creation and Training: Under Section 101 and Section 102, grant recipients must implement resource allocation plans that prioritize local hiring. These provisions create economic opportunities for local workers, veterans, and traditionally disadvantaged individuals while expanding training and apprenticeship programs.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Administrative and Compliance Burdens: Under Section 101 and Section 103, grant recipients must establish and maintain public digitized platforms and resource allocation plans, and they must engage in extensive community planning processes. These complex compliance requirements and reporting mandates could impose heavy administrative burdens on under-resourced local educational agencies and school staff.
-
Potential Restraints on Contracting Flexibility: Under Section 102 and Section 103, contractors and grant recipients must adhere to strict labor standards, such as prevailing wage requirements, project labor agreements for projects over twenty-five million dollars, and restrictions on hiring through temporary staffing agencies. These rules could potentially limit contracting flexibility and increase overall project costs for schools.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+10Good For Children+9Good For Native Americans+9Good For Students+9Good For Low Income Households+8Good For African Americans+7Good For Hispanic Americans+7Good For Union Workers+7Good For Veterans+6Good For Young Adults+6Good For L G B T Q Community+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Urban Residents+5Good For Women+5Good For Business Owners+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+9Improves Racial Equity+8Improves Policing Reform+6Improves Poverty Reduction+6Improves Gender Equality+5Improves L G B T Q Rights+5Reduces Homelessness+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Increases Renewable Energy Investment+9Reduces Carbon Emissions+9Improves Environmental Protections+8Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+7Reduces Fossil Fuel Production+5Improves Public Transit+4
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+7Improves Union Protections+5Improves Small Business Support+4Improves Economic Growth+3
- Education And Technology
- Increases Public School Funding+10Improves Internet Access+7
- Healthcare
- Improves Mental Health Access+7Improves Pandemic Preparedness+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Increases Federal Power+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+4Increases Domestic Surveillance-2
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/27/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan