Bill · H.R. 9914· House(119-HR-9914)
Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act
- Introduced
- 7/23/2026
- Last activity
- 7/23/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Robert Latta
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 12
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Collaboration on Adversarial Threats and Security Risks Act," establishes an antitrust exemption for certain activities related to artificial intelligence. It allows non-Federal entities to exchange information or coordinate actions to address specific artificial intelligence security risks. These risks include threats involving national security, chemical or biological weapons, or disruptions to critical infrastructure. Entities may coordinate to delay or limit the development or release of AI, provided they give written notice to the Assistant Attorney General. The act provides an affirmative defense for such actions under antitrust laws, provided they are done in good faith and for an exclusive security purpose.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+7
Prevents AI from being weaponized for offensive cyber attacks and protects against theft by covered nations.
Would billionaires be better off under this?+5
Primarily benefits owners of the largest AI frontier model companies by allowing coordination without antitrust penalties.
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
Provides legal protection from antitrust lawsuits when collaborating on AI security.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-6
Specifically exempts information regarding AI release delays from public disclosure.
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?-4
Provides an antitrust exemption for large AI entities, reducing the likelihood of regulatory action against their collaboration.
Is this likely to grow the economy?-2
Potential limits on AI development and release could slow economic growth in the tech sector.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Risk Mitigation Through Cooperation: The bill allows two or more non-Federal entities to exchange information or assistance regarding "covered artificial intelligence security risks" (Section 3(a)(1)). This could help protect against threats such as the theft or weaponization of AI by covered nations, the development of weapons, or disruptions to critical infrastructure (Section 2(6)).
-
Controlled AI Deployment: Entities can coordinate to reduce risks by delaying or limiting the release, deployment, or development of artificial intelligence (Section 3(a)(2)). This requires the entity to provide written notice to the Assistant Attorney General detailing the specific risk (Section 3(a)(2)).
-
Protection of Sensitive Information: Information submitted to the Assistant Attorney General regarding proposed restrictions is deemed voluntarily shared and is withheld from the public (Section 3(e)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Burden of Proof on Entities: If an entity uses the antitrust exemption, they bear the burden of proving by a "preponderance of the evidence" that their actions were taken in good faith and for the exclusive security purpose intended (Section 3(c)).
-
Risk of Increased Security Threats: The Attorney General can seek an injunction against these coordinated actions if it is demonstrated that the actions are "reasonably likely to result in an overall increase in covered artificial intelligence security risks" (Section 4(b)(2)).
-
Strict Limitations on Information Use: A non-Federal entity receiving information or assistance must implement "reasonable internal controls" to ensure that the information is not used for any purpose other than the specific security purpose intended (Section 3(b)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Billionaires+5Good For Business Owners+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Cybersecurity Defense+7
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation-4
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+2Improves Government Transparency-6
- Healthcare
- Improves Pandemic Preparedness+4
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3Improves Economic Growth-2Improves Small Business Support-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Freedom Of Speech-1
- 9/16/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 9/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Darrell IssaRepublican · California
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Nathaniel MoranRepublican · Texas
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California