Bill · H.R. 9892· House(119-HR-9892)
Stop EU Overreach Act
- Introduced
- 7/23/2026
- Last activity
- 7/23/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Craig Goldman
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Stop EU Overreach Act requires the United States Trade Representative to launch a formal investigation into certain European Union energy and environmental regulations. This investigation will look at whether these European rules place an unfair burden or cost on American companies and workers. If the investigation finds that the European Union is unfairly harming American commerce, the Trade Representative is directed to consider taking retaliatory trade actions. The bill also sets strict reporting requirements for the Trade Representative to keep Congress informed throughout the process. Finally, the bill includes sunset provisions so that the requirements end if the European Union removes these burdens or enters into a binding agreement with the United States.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would business owners be better off under this?+2
The bill directly addresses and seeks to reduce compliance burdens on business owners and their entities.
Is this likely to create jobs?+1
The bill may help protect U.S. business competitiveness by addressing burdensome foreign regulatory costs.
Is this likely to grow the economy?+1
The bill aims to reduce compliance costs and competitive disadvantages for U.S. companies operating internationally.
The opposite
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-2
The bill challenges EU regulations specifically designed to manage carbon emissions and deforestation.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?-1
The potential for trade retaliation or duties could impact the availability and price of goods for consumers.
Would union members be better off under this?-1
The bill's focus on reducing sustainability and supply chain due diligence obligations may impact labor standard monitoring.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of U.S. Commerce: Under Section 3(a)(1), the United States Trade Representative must investigate whether European Union regulations place unreasonable or discriminatory burdens on American commerce. This provides a formal process to push back against foreign rules that hurt American businesses and workers.
-
Support for Affected Businesses and Workers: Under Section 3(c), the Trade Representative is required to consult with affected American citizens, trade associations, and labor representatives. This ensures that the people directly impacted by these foreign rules have a voice in the government's response.
-
Clear Accountability and Reporting: Under Section 4, the Trade Representative must submit detailed reports to designated committees in Congress regarding the investigation, consultations, and potential remedial actions. This holds our elected officials and appointed leaders accountable by ensuring transparency in how they handle trade disputes.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential for Escalated Trade Tensions: Under Section 3(e)(1), if the Trade Representative makes an affirmative determination, they must consider actions such as imposing new duties on European imports or suspending trade agreement benefits. This could lead to a broader trade dispute that might increase costs for everyday consumers who buy imported goods.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1Improves Small Business Support+1Increases Job Creation+1Improves Consumer Protection-1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Carbon Emissions-2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+2Good For Union Workers-1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Trade+1
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Clay FullerRepublican · Georgia
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas