Bill · H.R. 9421· House(119-HR-9421)
Ban Abortion by Mail Act
- Introduced
- 6/24/2026
- Last activity
- 6/24/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Sheri Biggs
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Ban Abortion by Mail Act" aims to stop the remote prescription of mifepristone and other abortion drugs. It requires REMS-certified providers to conduct an in-person visit with the patient. Additionally, providers must hold a medical license in the state where the patient lives. Providers who violate these rules will lose their REMS-certified status for at least two years. The Secretary of Health and Human Services must report annual losses of certification to Congress.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+4
The bill increases federal oversight by mandating REMS certification standards and reporting to Congress.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
The bill reinforces state medical licensing requirements by requiring providers to be licensed in the patient's state.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
Requires the Secretary of HHS to submit annual reports to Congress on certification losses.
The opposite· 3 of 19
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?-9
Rural residents are most severely impacted by the ban on mail-order drugs and the requirement for in-person visits.
Does this make abortion easier to get?-9
The bill significantly restricts access to abortion medications by banning mail-order prescriptions and requiring in-person visits.
Would women be better off under this?-8
The bill directly restricts women's access to abortion medications through mandatory in-person visits.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Patient Observation: Section 2 states that medical experts advise patients be closely observed for signs and symptoms of adverse effects, which suggests that requiring in-person visits could address safety concerns.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Loss of Provider Access: Section 3(a) and 3(b) mandate that providers will lose their REMS-certified status for at least 2 years if they prescribe abortion drugs without an in-person visit or without a license in the patient's state. This could reduce the number of certified providers available to prescribe these medications.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents-9Good For Women-8Good For Low Income Households-7Good For Native Americans-7Good For People With Disabilities-6Good For African Americans-5Good For Asian Americans-5Good For Hispanic Americans-5Good For Immigrants-5Good For Middle Aged-4Good For Students-4Good For Young Adults-4Good For L G B T Q Community-3Good For Middle Class Households-3Good For Urban Residents-2Good For High Income Households-1
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access-9Improves Healthcare Access-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+4Increase States Rights+3Improves Government Transparency+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality-6
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
W. SteubeRepublican · Florida
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas