Bill · H.R. 9387· House(119-HR-9387)
REAL Butter Act
- Introduced
- 6/22/2026
- Last activity
- 6/22/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Tony Wied
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Recognizing Engineered Alternatives as Lab-Created Butter Act" or the "REAL Butter Act," aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. It seeks to ensure consumer choice by requiring specific labeling for synthesized butter products. Under this Act, any product marketed as butter that uses milkfat synthesized through non-agricultural processes must be labeled. Specifically, the label must state "lab-created butter" or "contains lab-created butter" before the product name. This ensures that products failing to meet the standard of identity for butter established in the Act of March 4, 1923, are clearly identified.
Yes
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5
The bill enhances consumer protection by requiring clear labeling for synthesized butter products so consumers know what they are purchasing.
Would farmers be better off under this?+3
The bill protects traditional agricultural dairy producers by distinguishing their products from synthesized alternatives.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+2
The bill provides transparency that helps middle-income consumers make informed food purchasing decisions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Consumer Choice: The bill requires truthful labeling for synthesized butter products, which allows consumers to make informed decisions about what they are buying (Section 2).
-
Increased Transparency: By requiring the terms "lab-created butter" or "contains lab-created butter" to appear immediately before the product name, the Act ensures consumers know if a product utilizes milkfat from non-agricultural processes (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+3Good For Middle Class Households+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Scott FitzgeraldRepublican · Wisconsin
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
David SchweikertRepublican · Arizona
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin