Bill · H.R. 9373· House(119-HR-9373)
Air Carrier Access Amendments Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/18/2026
- Last activity
- 6/18/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Sponsored by
- Dina Titus
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Air Carrier Access Amendments Act of 2026. It aims to update protections for air transportation passengers with disabilities who face discrimination. The text notes that travelers with disabilities still face major barriers like damaged assistive devices and inaccessible aircraft. It allows the government to assess civil penalties for specific violations against passengers with disabilities. Additionally, the legislation gives aggrieved individuals the right to bring a civil action against air carriers in a United States district court.
Yes· 3 of 8
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+10
Directly provides enhanced legal protections and financial remedies for disability-based discrimination.
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+10
Provides significant new legal remedies and penalties to protect passengers with disabilities from discrimination.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+7
The bill explicitly mentions veterans as a group that continues to experience barriers in air transportation.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
Air carriers (businesses) face new civil penalties and legal liabilities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Civil Action for Aggrieved Persons: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1), any person aggrieved by a violation can bring a civil action in a United States district court for appropriate relief, including compensatory and punitive damages. This is positive because it gives passengers a direct legal path to hold airlines accountable.
-
Recovery of Costs and Fees: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1)(B), a court shall award reasonable attorney's fees, reasonable expert fees, and court costs to the prevailing party. This is beneficial because it helps everyday people afford the legal help they need to fight airline discrimination.
-
Mandatory Civil Penalties for Specific Violations: Under Section 3, amending subsection (c)(1)(C), the Secretary must assess a civil penalty for minimum violations such as the delay of, loss of, or significant damage to a wheelchair or scooter, or physical harm to a passenger. This is positive because it directly penalizes airlines for damaging critical equipment or hurting travelers.
-
No Requirement to Exhaust Administrative Remedies: Under Section 3, adding subsection (d)(1)(C), an aggrieved person is not required to exhaust administrative remedies before bringing a civil action. This is a positive step because it cuts through red tape and lets victims go straight to court.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly stated negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+10Good For Veterans+7Good For Retirees+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Business Owners-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+10
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Increases Federal Power+2
- 9/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia