Bill · H.R. 926· House(119-HR-926)
Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act
- Introduced
- 2/4/2025
- Last activity
- 1/14/2026 — Subcommittee Hearings Held
- Sponsored by
- Steve Cohen
- Cosponsors
- - 14 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Fort Pillow National Battlefield Park Study Act," directs the Secretary of the Interior to perform a special resource study of Fort Pillow Historic State Park in Henning, Tennessee. The study aims to evaluate the site's national significance and determine if it is suitable and feasible to become a unit of the National Historic Park System. The bill highlights the history of the site, including the 1864 battle and the massacre of Union troops and United States Colored Troops. It notes that the park currently consists of 1,642 acres and includes various attractions.
Yes
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+5
The bill seeks to preserve and honor the history of the United States Colored Troops, a significant part of African American history.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+5
The study aims to recognize the historical significance of the United States Colored Troops and the massacre they endured.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+2
Potential designation as a National Battlefield Park could increase interest and foot traffic for the Henning, Tennessee area.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Evaluation of National Significance: The Secretary of the Interior will evaluate the site's national significance (Section 3, subsection 1). This could provide a formal recognition of the historical importance of the location and the events that occurred there.
-
National Historic Park System Designation: The study will determine the suitability and feasibility of designating the park as a unit of the National Historic Park System (Section 3, subsection 2). This could potentially lead to the site becoming a National Battlefield Park.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+5Good For Rural Residents+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+5
- 1/14/2026
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
- 7/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Gabe AmoDemocrat · Rhode Island
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia