DemocratBill · H.R. 9038· House(119-HR-9038)

No Fencing at the United States Supreme Court Act

Rep. Norton
Age: 89 years
District of Columbia
Introduced
5/26/2026
Last activity
5/26/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Eleanor Norton
Cosponsors
None
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This bill, known as the "No Fencing at the United States Supreme Court Act," aims to restrict how federal money is used. It specifically prohibits the use of Federal funds to install permanent fencing around the United States Supreme Court Building or its grounds. This restriction applies to the building's perimeter and the grounds described in section 6101(b) of title 40, United States Code. However, the act does not prevent the repair or replacement of fencing that already existed when the act was passed.

Yes

  • Would people in cities be better off under this?+1

    The bill maintains the current accessibility of the Supreme Court grounds for those visiting the capital.

  • Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+1

    The bill reduces potential future government spending by prohibiting the use of federal funds for new permanent fencing at the Supreme Court.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+1

    The prohibition on new fencing may enhance the public's sense of accessibility to the Supreme Court.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.