Bill · H.R. 8967· House(119-HR-8967)
Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program Reauthorization
- Introduced
- 5/21/2026
- Last activity
- 5/21/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Randy Feenstra
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 10
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the ``Rural Community Hospital Demonstration Program Reauthorization'', aims to extend the existing demonstration program. It proposes changing the current extension period from 15 years to 20 years. This change involves amending various subsections of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. Additionally, the bill includes a rule for hospitals that were not original participants in the demonstration. These provisions ensure that certain rural community hospitals can participate under specific conditions.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+8
Directly supports rural residents by extending the rural community hospital demonstration program.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+7
Extends the rural community hospital demonstration program by five years to maintain health services in rural areas.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+6
Benefits older adults in rural communities by ensuring continued access to local hospital care.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Extended Program Duration: By striking the
15-year extension period'' and inserting a20-year extension period'' (Section 2(a) and Section 2(b)(1)), the bill provides a longer timeframe for the rural community hospital demonstration program. -
Opportunities for New Hospital Participation: The bill includes a new subparagraph (C) in Section 2(b)(2) which allows the Secretary to apply certain provisions to rural community hospitals that were not original participants. This applies to hospitals participating in the program between December 30, 2024, and January 1, 2027.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+8Good For Retirees+6Good For Seniors+6
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+7Increases Medicare Funding+6
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+6
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 15 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Nicholas BegichRepublican · Alaska
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Jared GoldenDemocrat · Maine
James GallagherRepublican · California
Ashley HinsonRepublican · Iowa
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico