Bill · H.R. 8776· House(119-HR-8776)
Officer Wellness and Peer Support Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 5/13/2026
- Last activity
- 5/13/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Laura Gillen
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Officer Wellness and Peer Support Act of 2026. It requires the Attorney General to submit a report to Congress within 270 days. The report must outline effective strategies and best practices to reduce mental health stigma among law enforcement officers. It also needs to encourage officers to use mental health resources and ensure those services remain confidential. Additionally, the report must provide recommendations for action to put these strategies into practice.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make mental health care easier to get?+5
The bill directs a report on strategies to encourage law enforcement officers to access mental health screenings and peer-to-peer counseling.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+5
The bill requires the report to address methods for ensuring the confidentiality of mental health services for officers.
Does this change how police departments operate?+4
The bill focuses on officer wellness and mental health stigma reduction as a component of law enforcement professional standards.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a)(1)(A) requires the report to include strategies to reduce mental health stigma among law enforcement officers, which is positive because it helps officers feel more comfortable seeking help.
-
Section 2(a)(1)(B) focuses on encouraging officers to access mental health screening and peer-to-peer counseling, which benefits officers by promoting their overall well-being.
-
Section 2(a)(1)(C) works to ensure the confidentiality of mental health services like peer crisis lines and employee assistance programs, which is a positive protection for officers seeking private support.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific negative impacts or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Mental Health Access+5Improves Opioid Crisis Response+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+4
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+3
- 9/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
John MannionDemocrat · New York
John RutherfordRepublican · Florida