Bill · H.R. 8680· House(119-HR-8680)
Armed Forces Carry Rights Protection Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 5/7/2026
- Last activity
- 5/7/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Jeff Crank
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Armed Forces Carry Rights Protection Act of 2026," seeks to amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016. It aims to establish a rebuttable presumption that favors allowing members of the Armed Forces to carry their personal firearms on military installations. This presumption applies when the member is on an installation, center, or facility but is not performing official duties. Additionally, the bill requires that any denial of such authorization must be provided in writing. These written denials must also include an objective and individualized basis for the decision.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would gun owners be better off under this?+8
The bill creates a legal presumption that favors the right of individuals to carry their personal firearms on military installations.
Does this protect the right to own guns?+7
The bill establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of members of the Armed Forces carrying personal firearms on military installations.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
The bill requires that any denial of firearm authorization be provided in writing with an objective and individualized basis.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Presumption of Authorization: The bill establishes a rebuttable presumption in favor of members of the Armed Forces carrying their own firearms while on an installation, center, or facility, provided they are not performing duty (Section 2, subsection b).
-
Accountability for Denials: If an authorization is denied, the member must receive a written notice that includes an objective, clearly describable, and individualized basis for that denial (Section 2, subsection c).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Gun Owners+8Good For Veterans+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Second Amendment Protections+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+3
- 6/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/7/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Pat HarriganRepublican · North Carolina
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Celeste MaloyRepublican · Utah
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia