Bill · H.R. 8494· House(119-HR-8494)
To prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from entering into, modifying, extending, or renewing, any contract or intergovernmental service agreement to establish or operate any new immigration detention model, including the use of warehouses, modular facilities, soft-sided structures, tent systems, and processing centers.
- Introduced
- 4/23/2026
- Last activity
- 4/24/2026 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
- Sponsored by
- Rashida Tlaib
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill seeks to prevent the Department of Homeland Security from creating or using any new immigration detention models. It specifically prohibits the agency from entering into or renewing contracts for facilities such as warehouses, modular units, tents, or processing centers. The legislation aims to stop the planned expansion of detention through the acquisition or retrofitting of industrial facilities. Additionally, it forbids the redirection of federal funds toward these new detention structures. Instead, the bill mandates that funds intended for these models be moved to services like housing and health care.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would immigrants be better off under this?+7
The bill seeks to prevent overcrowding, medical neglect, and unconscionable conditions in detention facilities.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+5
The bill transfers funds previously intended for detention models to affordable health care services.
Does this make housing cost less?+5
The bill mandates that funds from immigration detention models be transferred to affordable housing services.
The opposite
Does this tighten control of the border?-3
The bill restricts the infrastructure and facilities used for processing and detaining individuals under civil immigration authority.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2
The bill prohibits new large-scale spending on industrial immigration detention facilities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Human Rights and Well-being: The bill aims to prevent the use of facilities that may involve medical neglect, overcrowding, or cruel and unusual conditions (Section 1(a)(5)).
-
Prevention of Deaths in Detention: By stopping new models, the bill addresses concerns regarding reported deaths in immigration detention facilities (Section 1(a)(6)).
-
Support for Local Communities: The bill seeks to prevent the diversion of critical resources like water, electricity, and local tax revenue away from surrounding communities (Section 1(a)(8)).
-
Public Health Protections: The prohibition prevents the use of facilities that lack necessary infrastructure like sewage and sanitation systems (Section 1(a)(9)).
-
Increased Funding for Essential Services: Funds originally intended for new immigration detention models would be transferred to needed services such as affordable health care and housing (Section 1(c)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Impact on Immigration Processing: The bill prohibits the establishment, operation, or expansion of facilities used for housing, processing, or detaining individuals under civil immigration authority (Section 1(b)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+7Good For Low Income Households+4
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+5Improves Border Security-3
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/27/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/24/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
- 4/23/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Joaquin CastroDemocrat · Texas
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida