Bill · H.R. 8482· House(119-HR-8482)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify certain investment credit rules with respect to nuclear facilities.
- Introduced
- 4/23/2026
- Last activity
- 4/23/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Pat Harrigan
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 regarding investment credit rules for nuclear facilities. It proposes changes to how these facilities are treated in relation to public utility property limitations. Specifically, it seeks to remove certain progress expenditures limitations for qualified facilities that use nuclear energy to produce electricity. These changes would apply to taxable years starting after December 31, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
The bill provides tax advantages for businesses operating nuclear energy facilities.
Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power?+4
The bill incentivizes investment in nuclear energy by removing certain progress expenditure limitations.
Does this cut the tax on profits from selling investments?+3
The bill modifies investment credit rules which can enhance the after-tax returns on energy investments.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Modification of Investment Credit Rules: The bill allows for an election to remove the public utility property limitation for qualified facilities that use nuclear energy to produce electricity (Section 1(a)). This modification to Section 50(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code could change how these facilities are treated regarding investment credits.
-
Removal of Progress Expenditures Limitation: The bill removes the progress expenditures limitation for eligible credits determined for qualified facilities using nuclear energy to produce electricity (Section 1(b)). This amends Section 6418(g)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Capital Gains Tax+3Improves Economic Growth+2Increases Job Creation+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4Good For Urban Residents+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Increases Renewable Energy Investment+4
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Brian JackRepublican · Georgia
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Addison McDowellRepublican · North Carolina
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Matt Van EppsRepublican · Tennessee
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California