Bill · H.R. 8049· House(119-HR-8049)
End Special Treatment for Congress at Airports Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 3/24/2026
- Last activity
- 3/25/2026 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
- Sponsored by
- Ashley Hinson
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "End Special Treatment for Congress at Airports Act of 2026," aims to stop Members of Congress from getting special treatment during airport security. It prohibits the Transportation Security Administration from using funds to give Members of Congress expedited or preferential access to security screenings. Specifically, it forbids them from being exempt from passenger and baggage screening or receiving priority access based on their official position. The law does not prevent Members from using public programs like Global Entry or PreCheck as long as they aren't using their office to get that access. The Administrator of the TSA must update policies to ensure this happens and provide a report to Congress on compliance within 180 days.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill increases transparency by requiring a report on implementation and compliance regarding security procedures.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+1
The bill ensures that government officials do not receive preferential treatment over the general public at security checkpoints.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+1
The bill promotes equal treatment of all passengers regardless of official status.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Equality in Security Procedures: By preventing Members of Congress from receiving priority or expedited access based on their official position, the bill ensures that no official gets to skip the line ahead of regular citizens (Section 3(b)).
-
Prohibition of Special Access Funds: The bill ensures that TSA funds are not used to facilitate preferential access for Members of Congress, maintaining that resources are used according to standard procedures (Section 3(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are identified in the text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+1Good For Asian Americans+1Good For Hispanic Americans+1Good For Low Income Households+1Good For Native Americans+1Good For Urban Residents+1Good For White Americans+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+1
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
- 3/24/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Diana HarshbargerRepublican · Tennessee
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire