Bill · H.R. 7769· House(119-HR-7769)
MINT Act
- Introduced
- 3/3/2026
- Last activity
- 3/3/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Lisa McClain
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 5
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Municipal Investment and Neighborhood Transformation Act" or the "MINT Act," aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary purpose is to restore the treatment of State and local bonds guaranteed by a Federal home loan bank as not being federally guaranteed for tax-exempt status purposes. It modifies specific clauses regarding bond issuance periods and updates safety and soundness requirements. These changes are directed at how the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency establishes requirements. The amendments apply to guarantees made after the date of the Act's enactment.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this cut taxes for middle-income families?+3
The bill restores the tax-exempt status of certain state and local bonds, which can lower borrowing costs for municipal projects that benefit middle-class communities.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
The bill restores the ability of state and local entities to issue tax-exempt bonds through Federal home loan bank guarantees.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+2
The preservation of tax-exempt municipal bonds can lead to more efficient local government spending on public services used by middle-class families.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Tax-Exempt Status Clarification: By striking the specific period mentioned in the text, the bill restores the treatment of certain State and local bonds so they are not viewed as federally guaranteed, which affects their tax-exempt status under Section 149(b)(3)(A).
-
Flexible Safety Requirements: The bill updates safety and soundness requirements by allowing the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency to establish them from time to time, as stated in Section 2(b).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Urban Residents+2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Middle Class Taxes+3Improves Economic Growth+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Roads And Bridges+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+2
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Marie PerezDemocrat · Washington
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Young KimRepublican · California
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia