Bill · H.R. 7352· House(119-HR-7352)
PASTEUR Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 2/4/2026
- Last activity
- 2/4/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Earl Carter
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 17
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The PASTEUR Act of 2026 aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to develop a program for innovative antimicrobial drugs. This legislation establishes a system where the Secretary can enter into contracts with sponsors to ensure the availability of drugs targeting challenging pathogens and threatening infections. The bill seeks to stimulate research, development, and market access for lifesaving medicines while maintaining high medical care standards. It includes a scoring system to identify eligible antimicrobials based on patient care, innovation, and public health benefits. Additionally, the act provides for annual payments to drug sponsors and establishes a grant program to support healthcare facilities in antimicrobial stewardship.
Yes· 3 of 15
Does this put more money into medical research?+5
The bill provides substantial funding for the research and development of novel antimicrobials.
Does this put more money into scientific research?+5
The bill allocates billions to stimulate research for new antimicrobial drugs.
Would business owners be better off under this?+3
The bill provides predictable revenue streams for pharmaceutical sponsors through contracts.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-1
The bill authorizes $6,000,000,000 in new spending which increases the national debt.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1
The bill increases government spending through new drug contracts and grant programs.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-1
The bill adds significant new emergency spending obligations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Availability of Lifesaving Medicines: The bill allows the Secretary to enter into contracts with sponsors to ensure the availability of eligible antimicrobials (Section 399PP(a)).
-
Improved Patient Care Outcomes: The scoring methodology rewards drugs that improve clinical outcomes for patients with multi-drug-resistant infections, reduce toxicity, and reduce adverse events (Section 399PP(d)(2)(A)).
-
Support for Health System Preparedness: The act is intended to promote national health system preparedness and defend the United States and its military (Section 2).
-
Enhanced Stewardship in Healthcare Facilities: A grant program will be established to help hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and other healthcare facilities judiciously use antimicrobial drugs (Section 399PP-2(a)(1)).
-
Prioritization of Underserved Areas: Grant awards will prioritize facilities in rural areas, critical access hospitals, those serving Tribal populations, and safety-net hospitals (Section 399PP-2(a)(2)).
-
Improved Outpatient Care: A pilot program will provide grants to outpatient entities, such as urgent care settings and retail clinics, to implement antibiotic stewardship programs (Section 399PP-2(b)).
-
Better Data for Public Health: The Secretary will collect and, starting two years after enactment, make publicly available data regarding antimicrobial resistance and use to improve monitoring of health trends (Section 399PP-2(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burden of Annual Payments: The bill authorizes annual payments to drug sponsors ranging from $75,000,000 to $300,000,000 per year (Section 399PP(f)(2)(A)).
-
Potential for Limited Access Based on Clinical Research: The bill states that the Secretary may not use evidence from comparative clinical effectiveness research to treat the lives of elderly, disabled, or terminally ill individuals as having lower value for calculating payments, but acknowledges this as a factor in calculating annual payments (Section 399PP(f)(5)(B)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+3Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Native Americans+2Good For Low Income Households+1Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Veterans+1
- Healthcare
- Increases Research Funding+5Improves Pandemic Preparedness+3Improves Healthcare Access+2
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1Improves Fiscal Responsibility-1Reduces Government Spending-1Reduces National Debt-1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+1
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/12/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/9/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia