Bill · H.R. 7220· House(119-HR-7220)
COINTELPRO Full Disclosure Act
- Introduced
- 1/22/2026
- Last activity
- 1/22/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Summer Lee
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The COINTELPRO Full Disclosure Act requires the public disclosure of all government records related to the COINTELPRO program. It mandates the creation of a specific COINTELPRO Records Collection at the National Archives to house these documents. To oversee this process, the bill establishes the COINTELPRO Records Review Board as an independent agency. This board is tasked with reviewing decisions regarding what information can be withheld from the public. The Act also sets strict timelines for disclosure and provides mechanisms for reviewing exceptions. Ultimately, the goal is to ensure historical transparency regarding these federal activities.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+10
The bill mandates the full public disclosure of previously secret COINTELPRO records and establishes a dedicated collection at the National Archives.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+7
The bill promotes historical transparency regarding the surveillance and disruption of domestic organizations, which disproportionately affected racial justice movements.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+6
The disclosure of COINTELPRO records provides historical clarity on the surveillance of Black political and social organizations.
The opposite
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?-3
The bill's disclosure requirements could potentially reveal the identities of individuals who provided confidential information or compromise personal privacy.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency: The bill requires government offices to fully disclose COINTELPRO records to the public within a specific timeframe (Section 2).
-
Historical Access: The establishment of a dedicated COINTELPRO Records Collection at the National Archives ensures that these records are preserved and made available for public inspection and copying (Section 3).
-
Expert Oversight: The creation of the COINTELPRO Records Review Board provides an independent body to review whether records should be partially or fully disclosed, acting as a check on government secrecy (Section 4).
-
Victim Notification: The bill requires government entities to make reasonable efforts to provide records to the actual victims of the events described or their next of kin before public disclosure (Section 2).
-
Information Unsealing: The Review Board has the power to request that the Attorney General petition courts to release information held under seal or under grand jury secrecy (Section 7).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
National Security and Law Enforcement Risks: The bill allows for exceptions where disclosure could cause identifiable damage to national security, military defense, or intelligence operations (Section 2).
-
Privacy Concerns: Disclosure could potentially reveal the identity of living individuals who provided confidential information to the U.S., posing a risk to them (Section 2).
-
Personal Privacy Protections: The Act includes provisions to ensure that personnel and medical files are not disclosed if it would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (Section 8).
-
Interference with Legal Proceedings: The bill allows for the withholding of information if disclosure would interfere with ongoing law enforcement proceedings (Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+7Improves Policing Reform+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+10Improves Privacy Rights-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+6
- 5/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Anna Paulina LunaRepublican · Florida
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan