Bill · H.R. 7161· House(119-HR-7161)
No Private Bounty Hunters for Immigration Enforcement Act
- Introduced
- 1/20/2026
- Last activity
- 1/20/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Raja Krishnamoorthi
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "No Private Bounty Hunters for Immigration Enforcement Act," seeks to restrict how Federal contractors are used for immigration enforcement. It prohibits the Secretary of Homeland Security from entering into new contracts for skip tracing, surveillance, or location verification for civil immigration enforcement. The Act also requires the termination or amendment of existing contracts that perform these specific activities. Furthermore, it limits the use of Federal funds to pay private entities on a per-person or bonus basis for locating individuals subject to civil immigration detainers. Finally, it mandates an audit by the Inspector General to ensure compliance with these new limitations.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would immigrants be better off under this?+4
The bill prohibits private entities from receiving bonuses for locating individuals and restricts skip tracing and field surveillance for civil immigration enforcement.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+3
The bill limits the use of private contractors for skip tracing and surveillance which are often used in immigration enforcement targeting Hispanic communities.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The bill mandates an audit by the Inspector General to ensure compliance with contract limitations.
The opposite
Is this likely to create jobs?-3
The bill prohibits new contracts for skip tracing, surveillance, or location verification for civil immigration enforcement.
Does this tighten control of the border?-2
The bill limits the ability of the Department of Homeland Security to use private contractors for skip tracing and surveillance in immigration enforcement.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Restriction of specific enforcement activities: The Secretary of Homeland Security would be prohibited from using contractors for skip tracing, surveillance, or location verification for civil immigration enforcement purposes (Section 2(a)(1)(A)). This could prevent the use of private entities to find individuals through personal data or field contact.
-
Prevention of bonus-based payments: The bill prohibits using Federal funds to pay private entities on a per-person or bonus basis for locating individuals with civil immigration detainers (Section 2(b)(1)). This would end the practice of paying entities based on the number of people they locate.
-
Increased oversight: The Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security is required to conduct an audit within 30 days of enactment to ensure all contracts comply with these new rules (Section 2(c)). This provides a check to ensure the law is being followed.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Removal of certain existing contract functions: The Secretary of Homeland Security would be required to terminate or amend existing contracts that currently provide for skip tracing, surveillance, or location verification for civil immigration law enforcement (Section 2(a)(1)(B)).
-
Prohibition on subcontractor activities: Any person with a contract or memorandum of understanding with the Secretary, or any subcontractor at any tier, is prohibited from using a subcontractor to perform the restricted functions (Section 2(a)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+4Good For Hispanic Americans+3Good For Low Income Households+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+2Increases Job Creation-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship+2Improves Poverty Reduction+1Improves Border Security-2
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan