Bill · H.R. 710· House(119-HR-710)
Regulation Decimation Act
- Introduced
- 1/23/2025
- Last activity
- 1/23/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- David Taylor
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Regulation Decimation Act" seeks to change how agencies create new rules. It requires an agency to repeal ten existing rules before it can issue a new one. For "major rules," the agency must also ensure the cost of the new rule is less than or equal to the cost of the rules being repealed. This mandate applies to any rule that imposes a cost or responsibility on a nongovernmental person, a State, or a local government. Agencies must also conduct a review of their rules to identify those that are costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated. Finally, the President must report on the status of rule reductions every five years.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?+6
The bill aims to reduce the costs and responsibilities imposed on nongovernmental persons through a reduction in regulations.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+5
The bill reduces the regulatory burden by requiring the repeal of existing rules before new ones can be issued.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+4
By limiting the ability of federal agencies to issue new regulations, the bill leaves more authority to state and local governments.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-6
The requirement to repeal ten rules before issuing a new one could prevent the implementation of new environmental protections.
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill restricts the discretionary power of federal agencies to create new rules and regulations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Reduction of Regulatory Burdens: Under Section 2, paragraph (4), the act applies to rules that impose costs or responsibilities on nongovernmental persons or State and local governments. By requiring the repeal of ten rules before a new one is issued, it could reduce these burdens.
-
Cost Control for Major Rules: Section 2, paragraph (2)(A)(ii) requires that for major rules, the cost of the new rule must be less than or equal to the cost of the rules being repealed. This could prevent the implementation of expensive new major regulations.
-
Increased Oversight of Outdated Rules: Section 2, paragraph (5) requires agency heads to submit a report identifying rules that are costly, ineffective, duplicative, or outdated. This process aims to identify unnecessary regulatory restrictions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on New Regulations: Section 2, paragraph (1) states that an agency may not issue a rule unless it has repealed ten or more related rules. This could prevent the issuance of new rules if an agency cannot find enough existing rules to repeal first.
-
Financial Constraints on Major Rules: Section 2, paragraph (2)(A) requires that the cost of a new major rule be less than or equal to the cost of the repealed rules. This could prevent the implementation of necessary major rules if they exceed the cost of the rules being removed.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+6Good For Rural Residents+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-6
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+4Increases Federal Power-5
- 3/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/23/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin