Bill · H.R. 7095· House(119-HR-7095)
Ending Importation of Laundered Russian Oil Act
- Introduced
- 1/15/2026
- Last activity
- 1/15/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Lloyd Doggett
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Ending Importation of Laundered Russian Oil Act," seeks to amend the existing Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act. It proposes a ban on the importation of specific energy products into the United States. Specifically, it targets products classified under chapter 27 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. This ban would apply to any products produced at a refinery that uses crude oil originating in the Russian Federation.
Yes
Does this strengthen ties with allied countries?+3
The bill strengthens international sanctions against Russia, aligning with broader geopolitical strategies.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this make trade with other countries easier?-2
The bill restricts international trade by banning specific energy products processed with Russian crude oil.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-1
Restricting energy imports can lead to higher fuel prices which disproportionately affect low-income households.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-1
Changes to energy product availability may influence domestic energy costs for middle-income families.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Closing Loopholes on Russian Oil: By banning products from refineries that use Russian crude oil, the bill aims to prevent the importation of energy products that may have been processed outside of Russia to circumvent previous restrictions. This is found in Section 2(a)(2), which inserts a new Section 3 into the original Act.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households-1Good For Middle Class Households-1Good For Rural Residents-1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+3Improves International Trade-2
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 12 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Gus BilirakisRepublican · Florida
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard McCormickRepublican · Georgia
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina