Bill · H.R. 7077· House(119-HR-7077)
To amend the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act to require a plan for data collection and analytical capability relating to the skilled technical workforce, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 1/14/2026
- Last activity
- 1/14/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
- Sponsored by
- Hillary Scholten
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes amendments to the Research and Development, Competition, and Innovation Act. It seeks to change how the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics operates regarding workforce assessments. Specifically, it requires a plan for initiating and maintaining a data collection and analytical capability. This plan would focus specifically on the skilled technical workforce. The changes would also establish a requirement for these assessments to occur biennially after the initial one-year period.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+1
The bill supports the technical workforce, which is a key component of middle-class employment sectors.
Would people in cities be better off under this?+1
Data on the technical workforce can help better inform economic and urban development policies.
Is this likely to create jobs?+1
By establishing a plan to monitor the skilled technical workforce, the bill aims to support the infrastructure needed for job growth in technical sectors.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved workforce data: By requiring a plan for initiating and maintaining a data collection and analytical capability, the bill aims to focus on the skilled technical workforce. This is found in Section 1.
-
Consistent updates: The bill changes the timeline to include a requirement that occurs "and biennially thereafter," ensuring regular updates rather than a single assessment. This is found in Section 1, paragraph (1).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Urban Residents+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1Increases Job Creation+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 1/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia