Bill · H.R. 7034· House(119-HR-7034)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the dollar limitations on the exclusion of gain from sales of principal residences, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 1/13/2026
- Last activity
- 1/13/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Craig Goldman
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary goal is to eliminate the current dollar limitations regarding the exclusion of gain from the sale of principal residences. It involves striking specific paragraphs within Section 121(b) and redesignating others. Additionally, it includes conforming amendments to Section 121(c). These changes would apply to all sales and exchanges occurring after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?+8
This bill disproportionately benefits those with significant equity in high-value residential properties.
Would high-income households be better off under this?+7
Higher income households with more expensive principal residences benefit most from removing the cap on gain exclusions.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+6
Seniors often sell high-value principal residences and would benefit from the removal of gain exclusion caps.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3
By eliminating tax exclusions on home sale gains, the bill reduces potential federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Elimination of dollar limits on home sale gains: Under Section 1, the bill would remove the current restrictions on how much profit can be excluded from taxes when a person sells their principal residence. This could benefit homeowners by allowing them to keep more of the gain from their home sales without hitting a specific dollar cap.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts identified: The provided text does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from this bill.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For High Net Worth Individuals+8Good For High Income Households+7Good For Seniors+6Good For Middle Class Households+5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Middle Class Taxes+5Reduces Small Business Taxes+2Reduces Government Spending-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+3
- 3/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Gabe EvansRepublican · Colorado
Mike HaridopolosRepublican · Florida
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Ronny JacksonRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas