Bill · H.R. 4327· House(119-HR-4327)
No Tax on Home Sales Act
- Introduced
- 7/10/2025
- Last activity
- 1/21/2026 — ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Alford asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4327, a bill originally introduced by Representative Greene (GA), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
- Sponsored by
- Marjorie Greene
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 1
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the No Tax on Home Sales Act, aims to change the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary purpose is to remove the current dollar limits that exist when excluding gains from the sale of a person's principal residence. The legislation includes specific instructions to amend Section 121(b) and Section 121(c) of the Code. These changes would impact how gains from home sales are treated for tax purposes. The amendments are set to apply to sales and exchanges occurring after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 14
Would high-income households be better off under this?+8
High-income households with expensive properties receive the largest absolute dollar amount of tax savings.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?+8
The bill greatly benefits high-net-worth individuals who own high-value principal residences.
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?+8
The removal of limits provides substantial tax advantages for very high-value property owners.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-3
Reducing tax revenue from home sales may negatively impact the federal budget and increase the national debt.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?-2
The loss of tax revenue could be viewed as a decrease in fiscal responsibility.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of limits on home sale gains: By striking the current paragraphs in Section 121(b), the bill eliminates the specific dollar limitations on the exclusion of gain from the sale of principal residences (Section 2(a)). This could benefit homeowners by allowing them to exclude all gains from the sale of their home regardless of the amount.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Billionaires+8Good For High Income Households+8Good For High Net Worth Individuals+8Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+8Good For Retirees+6Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Middle Aged+4Good For Urban Residents+4Good For Rural Residents+2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Capital Gains Tax+7Reduces Middle Class Taxes+5Improves Economic Growth+3Reduces National Debt-3Improves Fiscal Responsibility-2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+2
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Mr. Alford asked unanimous consent that he may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 4327, a bill originally introduced by Representative Greene (GA), for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Mark AlfordRepublican · Missouri
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Burgess OwensRepublican · Utah
David TaylorRepublican · Ohio