Bill · H.R. 699· House(119-HR-699)
No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund
- Introduced
- 1/23/2025
- Last activity
- 1/23/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Chip Roy
- Cosponsors
- - 11 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is titled the "No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund Act." It aims to prohibit the United States from providing money to the United Nations Population Fund. The legislation ensures that no funds from the Department of State or any other department or agency can be used for this purpose. This prohibition applies to both direct and indirect contributions.
Yes
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+1
The bill reduces government spending by prohibiting all direct and indirect contributions to the United Nations Population Fund.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would women be better off under this?-3
The United Nations Population Fund focuses on reproductive health, which specifically benefits women, and cutting its funding may negatively impact women globally.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?-2
Cutting funding to the United Nations Population Fund may reduce global access to reproductive and healthcare services.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-1
Reducing international aid to health funds can negatively impact low-income populations reliant on those global health initiatives.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention of fund usage: The bill ensures that no funds available to the Department of State or any other department or agency are used to provide contributions, whether directly or indirectly, to the United Nations Population Fund (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Loss of funding: By prohibiting any funds from being used to provide contributions directly or indirectly to the United Nations Population Fund, the bill stops the flow of money from the Department of State or any other department or agency to that specific organization (Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women-3Good For Low Income Households-1
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access-2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction-1
- 1/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/23/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Mark HarrisRepublican · North Carolina
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas