Bill · H.R. 6769· House(119-HR-6769)
Restoring Trust in Public Safety Act
- Introduced
- 12/16/2025
- Last activity
- 12/16/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jill Tokuda
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Restoring Trust in Public Safety Act authorizes the Attorney General to provide grants for firearm destruction activities. These grants are available to States, Tribal governments, and local government units or their law enforcement agencies. The program aims to assist entities in the full destruction of firearms and their components. Funding is intended for equipment, destruction services, and staff training. Additionally, the bill includes a preference for small urban and rural areas.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this put more limits on buying or owning guns?+5
The bill funds the physical destruction of firearms and their components through state, tribal, and local grants.
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+3
The bill explicitly includes Tribal governments as eligible entities for firearm destruction grants.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+3
The bill sets aside one-third of the funding for applicants representing rural areas or Metropolitan Statistical Areas.
The opposite
Would gun owners be better off under this?-4
The bill provides resources specifically for the destruction of firearms and their components.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Support for Local Government Activities: The bill allows the Attorney General to award grants to assist eligible entities in carrying out firearm destruction (Section 2(b)).
-
Resource Allocation for Equipment and Training: Grantees can use funds to purchase or maintain equipment like tools to smelt, crush, cut, or shred firearms, or to train staff in destruction techniques (Section 2(g)).
-
Benefit to Specific Geographic Areas: The Attorney General is required to set aside one-third of the total appropriated funding for applicants representing a Metropolitan Statistical Area or rural area (Section 2(i)).
-
Support for Localized Services: Funds can be used to contract with businesses that offer firearm destruction services, provided they destroy the firearm and all its parts (Section 2(g)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Administrative Restrictions: Eligible entities are limited to using no more than 10 percent of the funds for administrative costs (Section 2(h)).
-
Strict Compliance Requirements: Grantees and subgrantees must develop and maintain written policies regarding the identification, record-keeping, and documented proof of the destruction of firearms and other weapons (Section 2(f)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gun Control Measures+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+3Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Business Owners+2Good For Gun Owners-4
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+2
- 4/28/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jared MoskowitzDemocrat · Florida
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan