Bill · H.R. 6579· House(119-HR-6579)
Justice for Breonna Taylor Act
- Introduced
- 12/10/2025
- Last activity
- 12/10/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Morgan McGarvey
- Cosponsors
- - 30 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Justice for Breonna Taylor Act," aims to prohibit no-knock warrants. It establishes a federal prohibition that prevents Federal law enforcement officers from executing a warrant until they provide notice of their authority and purpose. Additionally, it creates restrictions for State and local law enforcement agencies that receive Department of Justice funds. These agencies would be prohibited from executing warrants that do not require officers to provide notice before forcibly entering a premises.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this change how police departments operate?+7
The bill mandates that federal and many state/local law enforcement officers provide notice of authority and purpose before entering a premises.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+6
The bill targets a police tactic that has historically resulted in high-profile incidents involving Black citizens.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+6
The bill aims to reduce the use of no-knock warrants, which have been disproportionately used against minority communities.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Requirement for notice by Federal officers: Under Section 2(a), Federal law enforcement officers must provide notice of their authority and purpose before executing a warrant, which prevents them from entering a premises without prior notice.
-
Requirement for notice by State and local agencies: Under Section 2(b), State or local law enforcement agencies that receive funds from the Department of Justice are prohibited from executing warrants that do not require the officer to provide notice of their authority and purpose before forcibly entering a premises.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+6Good For Urban Residents+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+7Improves Racial Equity+6
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+5
- 1/7/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/10/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 29 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Jonathan JacksonDemocrat · Illinois
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Sydney Kamlager-DoveDemocrat · California
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey