Bill · H.R. 6114· House(119-HR-6114)
To prohibit funds made available to the Department of Health and Human Services by previous Appropriations Acts from being used for any activity that makes Medicare Advantage the default under the Medicare program.
- Introduced
- 11/18/2025
- Last activity
- 11/18/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Mark Pocan
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to prevent the Department of Health and Human Services from using previously appropriated funds to make Medicare Advantage the default option. It specifically targets individuals entitled to benefits under part A and enrolled under part B of the Social Security Act. The legislation ensures that those who fail to make a specific election are not automatically deemed to have chosen an MA plan under part C. This restriction applies to all funds made available by previous Appropriations Acts for the current fiscal year.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
The bill protects seniors from being automatically enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans without their explicit election.
Would retired people be better off under this?+2
The bill ensures retirees maintain more control over their healthcare enrollment decisions.
Does this put more money into Medicare, the health coverage for people over 65?+1
The bill protects the existing structure of Medicare by preventing the automatic default to Medicare Advantage plans.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Protects Choice: By prohibiting the use of funds for activities that make Medicare Advantage the default, the bill prevents individuals from being automatically enrolled in an MA plan if they fail to make an election. (Section 1)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2
- Healthcare
- Increases Medicare Funding+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+1
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Mark TakanoDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan