Bill · H.R. 6090· House(119-HR-6090)
FRESHER Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 11/18/2025
- Last activity
- 11/29/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
- Sponsored by
- Jared Huffman
- Cosponsors
- - 22 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the FRESHER Act of 2025. It changes how certain industrial activities are handled under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Specifically, it removes a limitation on permit requirements regarding stormwater runoff from oil, gas, and mining operations. It also requires the Secretary of the Interior to study stormwater impacts related to oil or gas operations. Finally, the bill directs the Secretary to submit a report on these study results to Congress within one year of enactment.
Yes· 3 of 9
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+5
Provides critical analysis of groundwater contamination in areas likely to be impacted by oil and gas runoff.
Would farmers be better off under this?+4
Protects the aquifers and groundwater essential for agricultural operations.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+4
Directs a study on groundwater and aquifer contamination from oil and gas stormwater runoff.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-2
Potential for increased scrutiny and regulation of oil and gas operations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(c) requires the Secretary of the Interior to study stormwater impacts in areas that may be contaminated by stormwater runoff from oil or gas operations. This is a positive step because it includes analyzing measurable contamination, ground water resources, and the susceptibility of aquifers to contamination, which helps us understand environmental risks.
-
Section 2(c)(2) requires the Secretary to submit a report on the study's results to Congress within one year. This creates accountability by ensuring that our elected officials receive direct information about these environmental impacts.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not explicitly mention any specific negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+5Good For Farmers+4Good For Native Americans+3Good For Business Owners-2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+4Improves Public Land Management+3Improves Rural Development+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2Increases Federal Power+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+2
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/29/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
- 11/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- 20 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Diana DeGetteDemocrat · Colorado
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Joseph MorelleDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Juan VargasDemocrat · California