Bill · H.R. 5719· House(119-HR-5719)
To provide for interim appropriations for the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts with respect to any fiscal year for which appropriations are not otherwise provided for the commissions.
- Introduced
- 10/8/2025
- Last activity
- 10/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
- Sponsored by
- Eleanor Norton
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill provides for interim appropriations for the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts. It establishes a system for funding these entities if no new appropriations are provided for a given fiscal year. Starting with fiscal year 2025, the bill allows for necessary sums to be taken from the Treasury to cover expenses. These funds are provided at the same rate, terms, and conditions as the previous fiscal year. The interim funding ends once a subsequent appropriation or a general appropriation bill is enacted into law.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would people in cities be better off under this?+1
Ensuring the continued operation of capital planning and fine arts commissions benefits the administration and character of the nation's capital.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+1
The bill ensures continuity of operations for specific commissions through interim funding rather than requiring new, potentially larger budget requests.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+1
The bill ensures the National Capital Planning Commission can continue its role in planning and managing the nation's capital.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Continued Operations for Commissions: This bill ensures that the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission of Fine Arts can continue their operations even if new appropriations are not provided for a fiscal year. This is handled under Section 1(a).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are identified within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+1
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Land Management+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 10/8/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
- Introduced in House