Bill · H.R. 5603· House(119-HR-5603)
Emergency Responder Protection Act
- Introduced
- 9/26/2025
- Last activity
- 9/26/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Emily Randall
- Cosponsors
- - 14 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Emergency Responder Protection Act aims to restrict the authority of immigration officers at specific sites. It prohibits immigration enforcement actions from occurring within 1,000 feet of a protected emergency response location, unless exigent circumstances exist. The bill requires officers to consult supervisors when uncertainty arises regarding these circumstances. It also mandates increased discretion, reporting requirements, and annual training for officials. If enforcement is conducted in violation of these rules, the resulting information cannot be used in removal proceedings. These provisions are intended to limit the impact of immigration enforcement during emergency responses.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would immigrants be better off under this?+6
The bill creates a buffer zone around emergency sites and provides legal recourse if enforcement rules are violated.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates rigorous reporting requirements to Congress and the Inspector General regarding enforcement actions at protected sites.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+4
The bill provides protections against immigration enforcement near emergency response locations, which can benefit large Hispanic populations.
The opposite
Does this tighten control of the border?-2
The bill limits the scope of immigration enforcement near certain locations, which may reduce immediate capture opportunities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of people at emergency sites: Enforcement actions may not take place within 1,000 feet of a protected emergency response location, such as places providing disaster relief, food, water, or temporary shelter, unless there are exigent circumstances (Section 2(a)(1)(A) and Section 2(a)(9)(F)).
-
Increased accountability for enforcement actions: If an enforcement action is carried out in violation of this subsection, the information cannot be entered into the record or received into evidence in a removal proceeding, and the subject may file a motion for the immediate termination of the proceeding (Section 2(a)(4)).
-
Mandatory oversight and reporting: The Secretary of Homeland Security must provide reports to the Office of the Inspector General and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties after any enforcement action taken at a protected location (Section 2(a)(6)(A)).
-
Increased professionalism through training: Officials must ensure that employees under their supervision receive annual training regarding these requirements (Section 2(a)(5)(A)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Exceptions for high-risk individuals: The restrictions do not apply to the transportation of an individual apprehended near a land or sea border to a hospital or health care provider for medical care (Section 2(a)(3)(C)).
-
Exceptions for specific arrest operations: The protections do not apply to rare, premeditated arrest operations involving terrorist suspects, those posing a clear threat to national security, or those posing an extraordinary danger to public safety, provided there is prior written approval (Section 2(a)(3)(D)).
-
Potential delays due to exigent circumstance requirements: Enforcement actions must be discontinued if exigent circumstances cease, and officers must consult with supervisors if they are uncertain whether such circumstances still exist (Section 2(a)(1)(B) and Section 2(a)(1)(C)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+6Good For Hispanic Americans+4Good For Low Income Households+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship+1Improves Border Security-2
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/30/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Brad ShermanDemocrat · California
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan