Bill · H.R. 5552· House(119-HR-5552)
Eliminate Shutdowns Act
- Introduced
- 9/23/2025
- Last activity
- 9/23/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Dusty Johnson
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Eliminate Shutdowns Act" creates a system for automatic continuing appropriations when a lapse in funding occurs. If no appropriation Act is enacted for a fiscal year, funding for programs, projects, and activities is automatically provided at the rate of the preceding applicable appropriation Act. These funds are released in 14-day increments if the lapse continues. The Act also provides specific rules for entitlements, mandatory payments, and the transfer of funds between agency accounts. This process remains in effect until a new appropriation Act is signed into law.
Yes· 3 of 17
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Prevents interruptions in SNAP and other mandatory assistance payments.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+2
Ensures continuous funding for veterans' benefits and services.
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+2
Protects the continuity of the Food and Nutrition Act (SNAP) benefits.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Funding Lapses: By providing automatic appropriations during a "lapse in appropriations," the bill ensures that programs, projects, and activities continue to receive funding at the previous rate (Sec. 2(b)(1)).
-
Stability for Mandatory Payments: The bill ensures that entitlements and other mandatory payments, including activities under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, maintain program levels under current law (Sec. 2(b)(3)).
-
Agency Flexibility: Agency heads, with approval from the Office of Management and Budget, can transfer up to 5 percent of an appropriation account to another account to fund higher priority activities (Sec. 2(i)(1), (2), and (3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restriction on New Grants: The bill prohibits high initial rates of operation or the awarding of grants that would "impinge on final funding prerogatives" for programs that typically distribute funds to grantees, States, or foreign countries at the start of the year (Sec. 2(f)).
-
Limited Funding Scope: The Act mandates that only the "most limited funding action" permitted be taken to continue programs, which may restrict the level of support available (Sec. 2(g)).
-
Prohibition of New Activities: Funds cannot be used to start or resume any program, project, or activity that was specifically prohibited in the previous fiscal year (Sec. 2(j)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Veterans+2Good For Business Owners+1Good For Children+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For People With Disabilities+1Good For Retirees+1Good For Seniors+1Good For Union Workers+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2Improves Border Security+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+1Improves Public Land Management+1
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+1Improves Veterans Healthcare+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+2
- 7/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- 9/23/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Tom BarrettRepublican · Michigan
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Warren DavidsonRepublican · Ohio
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Mike KennedyRepublican · Utah
Michael LawlerRepublican · New York
Mariannette Miller-MeeksRepublican · Iowa
Cory MillsRepublican · Florida
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Derek SchmidtRepublican · Kansas
Derrick Van OrdenRepublican · Wisconsin