Bill · H.R. 5514· House(119-HR-5514)
POJA Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 9/19/2025
- Last activity
- 9/19/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Sponsored by
- Sylvia Garcia
- Cosponsors
- - 20 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Protect Older Job Applicants Act of 2025 aims to amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. It seeks to prohibit employers from limiting, segregating, or classifying applicants for employment. The bill expands existing protections to include people in the job application process. Additionally, it requires the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to conduct a specific study. This study will look at claims filed since 2015 to see how job applicants were impacted by age discrimination.
Yes
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+7
The bill extends protections against discrimination during the job application process to protect older workers.
Would retired people be better off under this?+5
The bill aims to protect older individuals seeking employment from discriminatory practices.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4
The bill requires the EEOC to make a report of its study on age discrimination available to the public.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Expanded Protections for Job Seekers: By amending Section 4(a)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, the bill prohibits employers from limiting, segregating, or classifying people based on age when they are applicants for employment rather than just current employees. This could help prevent discrimination during the hiring stage. (Section 2)
-
Increased Transparency and Data Collection: The bill requires the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to conduct a study on claims filed since 2015 to determine how job applicants may have been adversely impacted by age discrimination. This provides a clearer picture of the actual problem. (Section 3)
-
Development of Solutions: The study must include recommendations for best practices to prevent, combat, and address age discrimination in the hiring process, which could lead to fairer employment practices. (Section 3)
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Seniors+7Good For Retirees+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4
- 4/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/19/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · New York
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Jay ObernolteRepublican · California
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia