Bill · H.R. 5206· House(119-HR-5206)
Empowering Striking Workers Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 9/8/2025
- Last activity
- 9/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Donald Norcross
- Cosponsors
- - 52 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The ``Empowering Striking Workers Act of 2025'' proposes amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the Social Security Act. The bill aims to allow individuals engaged in a labor dispute to receive unemployment benefits. This includes people unable to work due to a strike, lock-out, or controversy regarding employment terms. Compensation would be payable starting from specific dates related to the dispute or the end of the dispute. Additionally, the bill would exempt these individuals from certain work availability requirements.
Yes· 3 of 7
Would union members be better off under this?+10
Directly benefits union members and striking workers by providing unemployment compensation during labor disputes.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?+9
By providing financial support to striking workers, the legislation significantly strengthens the leverage and protections of labor unions.
Does this increase support for people who lose their jobs?+8
The bill expands unemployment insurance eligibility to workers engaged in labor disputes or strikes.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
May increase labor dispute leverage for employees and potentially impact employer costs or unemployment insurance taxes.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Unemployment Benefits for Labor Disputes: Individuals who are employed but unable to work because of a labor dispute—such as a strike or lock-sout—could receive compensation. This includes controversies regarding terms, tenure, or conditions of employment, even if the dispute is an indirect result of the labor issue (Section 2(a)).
-
Exemption from Work Availability Requirements: Claimants unable to work due to a labor dispute would no longer be subject to certain work availability requirements that currently apply to claimants (Section 2(b)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+10Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Business Owners-3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+9Increases Unemployment Benefits+8
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+2
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/29/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/26/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/8/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 23 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Alma AdamsDemocrat · North Carolina
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Herbert ConawayDemocrat · New Jersey
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Robert MenendezDemocrat · New Jersey
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Frank PalloneDemocrat · New Jersey
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey