Bill · H.R. 5038· House(119-HR-5038)
American Protein Processing Modernization Act
- Introduced
- 8/26/2025
- Last activity
- 1/13/2026 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
- Sponsored by
- Brad Finstad
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The American Protein Processing Modernization Act directs the Secretary of Agriculture to create specific food safety criteria for meat and poultry establishments wishing to use alternate inspection rates. Within 90 days of enactment, the Secretary must publish these criteria and begin reviewing requests. The bill establishes a 90-day deadline for the Secretary to approve or deny these requests, noting that failure to respond results in automatic approval. It also provides guidelines for establishments currently operating at these rates and outlines the process for handling noncompliance and the revocation of inspection rates.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would business owners be better off under this?+4
The bill streamlines the approval process for meat and poultry establishments through automatic approval provisions.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?+3
The bill provides certainty for establishments by allowing requests to be deemed approved if the Secretary fails to respond within 90 days.
Would farmers be better off under this?+2
The bill requires the Secretary to consider the impact on animal producers and growers when adjusting inspection rates.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Predictability for Meat and Poultry Establishments: The bill requires the Secretary to publish clear food safety criteria within 90 days, which provides a standard for establishments to follow when requesting alternate inspection rates (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Timely Decision-Making: By requiring a response to requests within 90 days, the bill ensures that establishments are not left waiting indefinitely for a decision (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Automatic Approval for Lack of Action: If the Secretary fails to respond to a request within the 90-day window, the request is deemed approved, providing a fallback for businesses (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Business Continuity: Establishments already operating at alternate rates can continue doing so as long as they maintain effective process control or until a request is officially decided (Section 2(c)).
-
Minimized Disruption during Revocation: If an establishment's rates must be adjusted due to noncompliance, the Secretary is required to consider effects on live animal production and sourcing, and must consult with the establishment to minimize negative impacts on contractual obligations, animal producers or growers, and animal welfare (Section 2(e)(3)(B)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Risk of Unreviewed Requests: Because a failure by the Secretary to respond within 90 days results in a request being "deemed to have been approved," there is a possibility that requests could move forward without a formal response from the government (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Potential for Revocation of Inspection Rates: If an establishment fails to meet the required food safety criteria after receiving notice, the Secretary has the authority to revoke the establishment's ability to operate at alternate inspection rates (Section 2(e)(2)(A)(ii)).
-
Exclusion of Liability: The bill states that the Department of Agriculture or the Food Safety and Inspection Service bears no liability or responsibility regarding the safety of establishment workers or any environmental effects related to the alternate inspection rates (Section 2(g)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+4Good For Farmers+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2Increases Federal Power+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+1
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry.
- 8/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Mike FloodRepublican · Nebraska
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska