Bill · H.R. 4304· House(119-HR-4304)
Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation Act
- Introduced
- 7/7/2025
- Last activity
- 2/12/2026 — Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Ms. Titus. Petition No: 119-16. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2026021216">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
- Sponsored by
- Dina Titus
- Cosponsors
- - 14 - 11
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Fair Accounting for Income Realized from Betting Earnings Taxation Act" or "FAIR Bet Act," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The primary purpose is to change how wagering losses are handled. Specifically, it seeks to amend Section 165(d) of the code. The change involves striking the current "90 percent" figure and replacing it with "100 percent."
Yes· 3 of 5
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+3
Provides more comprehensive deduction of losses which can assist middle-income earners with gambling activities.
Would high-income households be better off under this?+3
Allows full deduction of losses, which benefits higher income earners with significant wagering activity.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?+3
Provides higher deduction limits for those with significant wagering losses.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-1
By allowing more deductions, the bill could slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Full Accounting of Losses: By changing the figure from "90 percent" to "100 percent" in Section 2, the bill allows for a different calculation regarding wagering losses under Section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned: The provided text does not contain any information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from this amendment.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For High Income Households+3Good For High Net Worth Individuals+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Middle Class Taxes+3Reduces National Debt-1
- 3/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2026
- Motion to Discharge Committee filed by Ms. Titus. Petition No: 119-16. (<a href="https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2026021216">Discharge petition</a> text with signatures.)
- 1/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 7/10/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 7/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Mark AmodeiRepublican · Nevada
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
Tom ColeRepublican · Oklahoma
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mike EzellRepublican · Mississippi
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Nick LaLotaRepublican · New York
Morgan McGarveyDemocrat · Kentucky
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Troy NehlsRepublican · Texas
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Guy ReschenthalerRepublican · Pennsylvania
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
David ValadaoRepublican · California
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey