Bill · H.R. 424· House(119-HR-424)
State Border Security Reimbursement Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 1/15/2025
- Last activity
- 1/15/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Dan Crenshaw
- Cosponsors
- - 13 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The State Border Security Reimbursement Act of 2025 aims to reimburse states for expenses related to border security and enforcement. The bill states that border security is a Federal responsibility and that states have been forced to provide resources due to Federal failures. To qualify, a state must have spent more than $2,500,000,000 on these efforts over the ten years prior to the Act's enactment. Eligible states must submit an accounting of non-federally funded expenses and the total sum within 180 days. Once the application is submitted, the Federal Government is required to reimburse the expenses within one year.
Yes
Does this tighten control of the border?+5
The bill provides financial reimbursement for state-led border security and enforcement efforts.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-2
The bill shifts the fiscal burden of border security from state budgets back to the federal government.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-1
The bill requires the federal government to reimburse states for border security expenses, which increases federal outlays.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Financial relief for eligible states: States that have spent more than $2,500,000,000 on border security and enforcement in the ten years prior to enactment will have their associated expenses reimbursed (Section 3(a)).
-
Reduction of tax burdens: The bill addresses the finding that citizens of border states are being taxed twice for the same purpose (Section 2(4)).
-
Relief of undue burden on state budgets: The bill seeks to address the issue of states using taxpayer dollars and state budgets to meet public safety obligations that are considered Federal responsibilities (Section 2(5)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly detailed in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-1
- 2/13/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/12/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/10/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/22/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 1/15/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Brian BabinRepublican · Texas
John CarterRepublican · Texas
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Jake EllzeyRepublican · Texas
Pat FallonRepublican · Texas
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
August PflugerRepublican · Texas
Chip RoyRepublican · Texas
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas