Bill · H.R. 3791· House(119-HR-3791)
EMS Counts Act
- Introduced
- 6/5/2025
- Last activity
- 6/5/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Sponsored by
- Glenn Thompson
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 7
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The EMS Counts Act requires the Secretary of Labor to update the Standard Occupational Classification System. This change is intended to ensure that the number of emergency medical services practitioners in the United States is counted accurately. Currently, the system fails to include dual-role workers like firefighter/EMTs and firefighter/paramedics. The bill mandates a revision to the occupational series for firefighters to include these specific roles. Finally, the Secretary must submit a report to Congress detailing these implementation steps.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+2
Accurate EMS data helps government agencies determine the needs of practitioners to better prepare for public health emergencies.
Does this make the country readier for the next outbreak?+2
The bill states that accurate EMS counts are crucial for informing preparedness for public health emergencies and outbreaks.
Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster?+2
Accurate classification of dual-role EMS workers aids in preparedness for natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Accurate Workforce Data: By including dual-role occupations such as firefighter/EMTs and firefighter/paramedics, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will more accurately count EMS personnel (Section 2, Finding 4; Section 3).
-
Improved Policy and Preparedness: Accurate data is considered critical for government agencies to determine the needs of EMS agencies and practitioners, which informs preparedness for public health emergencies, natural disasters, and acts of terrorism (Section 2, Finding 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+2Improves Pandemic Preparedness+2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+1Good For Urban Residents+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 4/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/5/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Donald DavisDemocrat · North Carolina
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Lucy McBathDemocrat · Georgia
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York