RepublicanBill · H.R. 3668· House(119-HR-3668)

Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act

Rep. Hudson
Age: 55 years
North Carolina
Introduced
6/2/2025
Last activity
12/15/2025 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Sponsored by
Richard Hudson
Cosponsors
Republican - 3Democrat - 0
Energy
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. In Senate committee

What this bill would do

The Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act aims to streamline the review process for natural gas pipeline authorizations. It establishes the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the sole lead agency for project-related NEPA reviews. The bill mandates coordination with various agencies and sets specific timelines for processing applications. It also addresses water quality certifications and requires agencies to implement plans to meet established schedules. Additionally, the act includes provisions for public transparency regarding application tracking and mandates security consultations.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+4

    The bill requires the Commission to track and publish project schedules, expected completion dates, and reasons for delays on its website.

  • Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?+3

    The bill mandates consultation with the TSA regarding pipeline cybersecurity and infrastructure security.

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+3

    The bill reduces regulatory uncertainty and shortens timelines for energy infrastructure applicants.

The opposite

  • Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-4

    The bill reduces the requirement for water quality certifications and limits the ability of agencies to conduct supplemental environmental reviews.

  • Would people in cities be better off under this?-1

    The reduction in water quality certification requirements could potentially impact local environmental protections near urban waterways.

  • Does this make housing cost less?-1

    The streamlining of energy infrastructure may have indirect effects on land use and housing availability.

What Congress actually voted on

2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.

  • The House: the vote on whether to pass the billPassed 213–184

    This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President.

    12/12/2025 · Roll call 334 · recorded as “On Passage”