RepublicanBill · H.R. 3633· House(119-HR-3633)

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act

Rep. Hill
Age: 70 years
Arkansas
Introduced
5/29/2025
Last activity
9/15/2026 — Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote No. 234) entered in Senate.
Sponsored by
J. Hill
Cosponsors
Republican - 14Democrat - 7
Finance and Financial Sector
  1. Introduced
  2. Passed House
  3. Awaiting Senate

What this bill would do

This bill establishes a comprehensive regulatory framework for the offer and sale of digital commodities, digital assets, and stablecoins through the SEC and CFTC. It provides specific definitions for blockchain technology and market participants while creating processes for blockchain systems to be certified as "mature." The legislation addresses the rights of individuals to maintain self-custody of digital assets and provides legal protections for software developers. Additionally, it establishes rules for digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers to protect customer assets and prevent market abuse. The bill also includes the "Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act" to prevent the issuance of a central bank digital currency directly to individuals. Finally, it creates innovation sandboxes and AI labs to encourage technological experimentation under regulatory oversight.

Yes· 3 of 14

  • Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+5

    It enhances consumer protection through mandatory disclosures, asset segregation, and increased regulatory oversight.

  • Does this make housing cost less?+5

    The bill incentivizes urban housing supply through adjustments to Community Development Block Grant allocations.

  • Would business owners be better off under this?+4

    The bill provides legal clarity and regulatory sandboxes that benefit digital asset entrepreneurs and businesses.

The opposite

  • Does this leave more decisions to the states?-3

    The bill exempts digital commodities from certain state laws, potentially limiting state regulatory authority.

  • Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-2

    The expansion of information-sharing programs may increase federal surveillance capabilities.

What Congress actually voted on

2 recorded votes have been taken on this bill. One of them decided something; the rest moved it along.

  • The House: the vote on whether to pass the billPassed 294–134

    This is the real decision in this chamber. Passing here sends the bill to the other chamber, which must pass it too before it can go to the President.

    07/17/2025 · Roll call 199 · recorded as “On Passage”