Bill · H.R. 3374· House(119-HR-3374)
Pink Tax Repeal Act
- Introduced
- 5/13/2025
- Last activity
- 5/13/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Norma Torres
- Cosponsors
- - 27 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Pink Tax Repeal Act" aims to stop companies from charging different prices for similar products or services based on gender. It would make it unlawful to price substantially similar consumer products differently if they are marketed or intended for different genders. This law also applies to services that are substantially similar. The Federal Trade Commission would be responsible for enforcing these rules. Additionally, State Attorneys General would have the power to bring civil actions to protect their residents.
Yes· 3 of 8
Would women be better off under this?+8
The bill directly targets the 'pink tax' which disproportionately affects women's purchasing power.
Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated?+8
The bill promotes gender equality by eliminating the 'pink tax' on similar consumer goods and services.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+7
The bill strengthens consumer protection by prohibiting gender-based price discrepancies for similar products and services.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
May impose new regulatory compliance burdens and restrictions on product marketing.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Fairer pricing for consumer products: The bill prohibits manufacturers from selling substantially similar products at different prices based on gender, which could prevent price discrepancies for items like cosmetics or devices (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Fairer pricing for services: It prohibits charging different prices for substantially similar services based on the gender of the person receiving them (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Legal recourse for residents: State Attorneys General are empowered to bring civil actions to seek damages, restitution, or compensation for residents if their interests are adversely affected by gender-based pricing (Section 2(c)(1)).
-
Protection against deceptive practices: Violations of this act would be treated as unfair or deceptive acts or practices under the Federal Trade Commission Act (Section 2(b)(1)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on product differentiation: The bill defines "substantially similar" products as those having no substantial differences in materials, intended use, or functional design, specifically noting that a difference in coloring does not make them different (Section 2(d)(1)). This could impact how companies market or color-code products.
-
Restrictions on service differentiation: Services are considered substantially similar if there is no substantial difference in the time, difficulty, or cost of providing them (Section 2(d)(2)). This could impact how different services are offered or marketed.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Women+8Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Men+3Good For Business Owners-3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+8
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+7
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+3Increases Federal Power+3
- 7/10/2025
- 8 Cosponsors added.
- 5/13/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 19 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Joyce BeattyDemocrat · Ohio
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Kathy CastorDemocrat · Florida
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Deborah RossDemocrat · North Carolina
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey