Bill · H.R. 3276· House(119-HR-3276)
Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 5/8/2025
- Last activity
- 9/15/2026 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- Sponsored by
- Debbie Dingell
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 3
- Introduced
- Passed House
- In Senate committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Local Communities & Bird Habitat Stewardship Act of 2026. It directs the Secretary of the Interior to establish a voluntary Urban Bird Treaty Program for conserving birds and their habitats in urban areas. The program involves protecting and restoring urban bird habitats, reducing urban hazards, and engaging communities through science and education. It also sets up a competitive grant program to help fund research, planning, workforce training, and management projects. The bill authorizes appropriations of $200,000 for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2033 to carry out these activities.
Yes· 3 of 22
Would people in cities be better off under this?+8
Directly targets the improvement of urban bird habitats and community engagement in cities.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+7
Directly focuses on protecting, restoring, and enhancing urban bird habitats.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+5
Improves the management of bird habitats within urban areas.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to passPassed 345–60
The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not.
09/14/2026 · Roll call 297 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a)(2)(A): This section directs the program to work with groups to educate and engage communities in caring about birds and their habitats, and to involve people in scientific monitoring activities. This is positive because it gets everyday citizens involved in local science and community education.
-
Section 2(a)(2)(B): This section provides technical and financial assistance through partnerships to build capacity and carry out bird conservation projects. This is beneficial because it helps local organizations get the actual resources and funding they need to do the work on the ground.
-
Section 2(a)(3)(A): This section establishes a competitive grant program for research, planning, management, and workforce training related to urban birds. This is a positive step because it can create training and job opportunities while helping communities improve their local environments.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that create negative consequences, burdens, or harms for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+8Good For Students+4Good For Children+3Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Native Americans+3Good For Young Adults+3Good For African Americans+2Good For Asian Americans+2Good For High Income Households+2Good For Hispanic Americans+2Good For Middle Aged+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2Good For White Americans+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+7Improves Public Land Management+5Reduces Carbon Emissions+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+3
- Healthcare
- Increases Research Funding+2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- 9/15/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
- 9/14/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 345 - 60 (Roll no. 297).
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 345 - 60 (Roll no. 297). (text: CR H5578-5579)
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5599)
- At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3276.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5578-5580)
- Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 8/20/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-758.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 659.
- 8/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/10/2026
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- 5/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/24/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2026
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/28/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 12/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/8/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
Ben ClineRepublican · Virginia
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Maria SalazarRepublican · Florida
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia