Bill · H.R. 2894· House(119-HR-2894)
SEER Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 4/10/2025
- Last activity
- 4/10/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Melanie Stansbury
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The SEER Act of 2025 aims to modify the definition and oversight of special Government employees. It seeks to address financial conflicts of interest and increase transparency regarding individuals serving in these roles. The bill implements stricter conflict-of-interest standards and requires certain waivers to be made public. It also restricts communications between certain special Government employees and large companies they may have an interest in. Additionally, the act mandates the creation of an electronic database to track these employees. Finally, it updates financial disclosure and online access requirements for specific individuals.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The bill mandates an online searchable database for special government employees and requires public disclosure of certain waivers.
Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists?+5
The bill restricts communications between special government employees and large companies they have an interest in to prevent undue influence.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
The bill imposes stricter conflict-of-interest standards and communication restrictions that may affect business leaders serving in government.
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?-3
The bill imposes stricter conflict-of-interest standards and communication restrictions that may affect business leaders serving in government.
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?-3
The bill imposes stricter conflict-of-interest standards and communication restrictions that may affect business leaders serving in government.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency of Conflicts: The bill requires that any waiver or exemption granted to certain special Government employees be made available via a searchable online database within 14 days (Section 3).
-
Public Oversight of Employees: A new electronic database will be maintained to show the name of covered individuals, how many days they have served, and the reason for their designation (Section 5).
-
Enhanced Disclosure: The bill modifies financial disclosure requirements to include certain special Government employees who are not on advisory committees or are serving as chairs or vice chairs (Section 6).
-
Prevention of Undue Influence: By restricting communications, the bill prevents certain special Government employees from communicating in their official capacity with agencies that contract with, regulate, or have enforcement actions against large companies they own or lead (Section 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Regulatory Burdens: The Office of Government Ethics must promulgate new regulations to carry out communication restrictions and define ownership of large companies (Section 4).
-
New Compliance Requirements: The Director must coordinate with the Office of Government Ethics to maintain, keep current, and make available a new electronic database (Section 5).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Reduces Lobbying+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Billionaires-3Good For Business Owners-3Good For High Net Worth Individuals-3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals-3
- 4/10/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan