Bill · H.R. 2470· House(119-HR-2470)
COST of Relocations Act
- Introduced
- 3/27/2025
- Last activity
- 3/27/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Suhas Subramanyam
- Cosponsors
- - 33 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Congressional Oversight to Secure Transparency of Relocations Act or the COST of Relocations Act. It requires Federal agencies to conduct a benefit-cost analysis before carrying out certain relocations of employment positions to different areas. The agency must submit an unredacted report of this analysis to its Office of Inspector General. The Inspector General must then review the report and submit their findings to specific Congressional committees. The bill defines what must be included in the analysis report, such as anticipated outcomes, employee engagement plans, risk assessments, and mission impacts. It also outlines specific rules for when these relocation rules apply based on the number of employees affected.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates that agencies make their relocation analysis reports publicly available.
Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+3
The bill requires benefit-cost analyses to justify the use of Federal funds for large-scale relocations.
The opposite
Would middle-income households be better off under this?-2
Federal employees may face job instability if their positions are replaced by ones in different commuting areas.
Would people in cities be better off under this?-2
The bill could result in the loss of federal jobs and economic activity in current agency regions due to relocations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a)(1)(B) requires agencies to submit an unredacted report of the benefit-cost analysis to their Office of Inspector General, which ensures that watchdogs have complete information to hold officials accountable.
-
Section 2(b)(2)(A)(iv) mandates a detailed employee engagement plan as part of the analysis report, which helps protect workers by ensuring their voices and concerns are considered during a move.
-
Section 2(b)(2)(A)(vii) requires an assessment of how the relocation may affect stakeholders served by the affected positions and those in the destination region, which helps protect the public from losing vital government services.
-
Section 2(b)(2)(B) requires Federal agencies to make the analysis report publicly available, promoting transparency so the people can see why tax dollars are being spent on a move.
-
Section 2(c) requires the Office of Inspector General to submit a review report to Congress within 90 days, giving elected officials the chance to oversee and check the actions of executive branch agencies.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no explicit provisions within the text of the bill that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Middle Class Households-2Good For Urban Residents-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Fiscal Responsibility+3
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/18/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/20/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 16 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Emanuel CleaverDemocrat · Missouri
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Gerald ConnollyDemocrat · Virginia
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Steny HoyerDemocrat · Maryland
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Glenn IveyDemocrat · Maryland
Stephen LynchDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kweisi MfumeDemocrat · Maryland
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
April McClain DelaneyDemocrat · Maryland
Analilia MejiaDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Robert ScottDemocrat · Virginia
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
James WalkinshawDemocrat · Virginia