Bill · H.R. 2251· House(119-HR-2251)
Protecting Individuals with Down Syndrome Act
- Introduced
- 3/21/2025
- Last activity
- 3/21/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Ron Estes
- Cosponsors
- - 16 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Protecting Individuals with Down Syndrome Act" seeks to amend title 18 of the United States Code to prohibit discrimination against unborn children on the basis of Down syndrome. It makes it unlawful to perform an abortion if the procedure is sought because of a Down syndrome diagnosis or any reason to believe the unborn child has the condition. The bill establishes specific criminal penalties, including fines and potential imprisonment, for those who violate these terms. It also allows for civil actions by qualified plaintiffs, such as the woman or the father, to seek damages. Additionally, the act mandates that certain medical professionals report suspected violations to law enforcement.
Yes
Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities?+8
The bill aims to protect individuals with Down syndrome from discrimination in medical procedures.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+7
The bill provides explicit legal protections against discrimination for those with Down syndrome.
Does this give the federal government more power?+5
The bill expands federal criminal and civil statutes regarding abortion discrimination.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this make abortion easier to get?-10
The bill prohibits abortions based on Down syndrome diagnoses, effectively restricting access for those specific circumstances.
Would women be better off under this?-5
The bill imposes criminal penalties and potential civil liability related to abortion procedures.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-3
The bill mandates medical professionals to report suspected violations to law enforcement.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection Against Disability-Based Discrimination: The bill aims to prohibit doctors from aborting unborn children specifically because they have been diagnosed with Down syndrome (Section 2, Paragraph 7).
-
Legal Recourse for Families: Qualified plaintiffs, which can include the woman, the father, or a maternal grandparent of an unemancipated minor, are permitted to bring civil actions to obtain relief and money damages (Section 3, Subsection (c) and (d)).
-
Financial Restitution: Victims of the prohibited actions may seek objectively verifiable money damages for physical and psychological injuries, as well as punitive damages (Section 3, Subsection (d)(3)).
-
Privacy Protections: The bill requires courts to take steps to protect the anonymity of a woman during legal proceedings, including the use of pseudonyms (Section 3, Subsection (i)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Criminal Penalties for Medical Procedures: Individuals who perform, solicit, or transport for an abortion deemed in violation of this section face fines and up to five years in prison (Section 3, Subsection (b) and (c)).
-
Mandatory Reporting Burdens: Medical professionals, such as doctors or nurses, are required to report known or suspected violations to law enforcement or face fines and up to one year in prison (Section 3, Subsection (g)).
-
Civil Litigation Risks: The bill opens the door for various parties to bring civil lawsuits against those involved in the prohibited abortions, seeking various forms of relief and damages (Section 3, Subsection (d)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Healthcare
- Improves Abortion Access-10
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+8
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+5Improves Privacy Rights-2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Increases Domestic Surveillance-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For People With Disabilities+7Good For Women-5
- 9/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 10/31/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 10/28/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 4/7/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/21/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Russell FryRepublican · South Carolina
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
John MoolenaarRepublican · Michigan
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Blake MooreRepublican · Utah
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Christopher SmithRepublican · New Jersey
Marlin StutzmanRepublican · Indiana
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas
Roger WilliamsRepublican · Texas