Bill · H.R. 2184· House(119-HR-2184)
Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 3/18/2025
- Last activity
- 10/3/2025 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 290.
- Sponsored by
- Tom Emmer
- Cosponsors
- - 24 - 0
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
The Firearm Due Process Protection Act of 2025 aims to enforce the requirement that the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) completes requests to correct its records within 60 days. The bill establishes procedural rules for legal actions brought by those aggrieved by NICS violations. It requires courts to hold expedited hearings within 30 days of an action being brought. Additionally, the bill shifts the burden of proof to the respondent to prove an individual's ineligibility. The legislation also mandates annual reports to Congress regarding the processing of these challenges.
Yes· 3 of 4
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+8
The bill significantly strengthens due process by establishing expedited hearings and shifting the burden of proof to the respondent.
Would gun owners be better off under this?+8
The bill directly benefits gun owners by providing faster and more effective methods to correct NICS errors.
Does this protect the right to own guns?+7
The bill enhances second amendment protections by ensuring due process and expedited resolution when NICS records are contested.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Expedited Legal Process: The bill requires the court to hold a hearing within 30 days after an action is brought, which provides a faster resolution for individuals (Section 2, subsection b-1).
-
Shifted Burden of Proof: The respondent must prove by clear and convincing evidence that an individual is ineligible to receive or possess a firearm, which protects the individual from unspecified denials (Section 2, subsection b-2).
-
Recovery of Costs: If a complainant substantially prevails in a legal action, the court shall assess reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs against the respondent (Section 2, subsection c-1).
-
Increased Oversight: The Director of the FBI must submit annual reports to Congress detailing the number of challenges received, processed, reversed, or not reversed, as well as the average time taken to complete them (Section 3).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Increased Litigation Costs for Respondents: The bill requires respondents to pay reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs if a complainant substantially prevails in an action (Section s, subsection c-1).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+8Improves Government Transparency+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Gun Owners+8
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Second Amendment Protections+7
- 10/3/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-338.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 290.
- 7/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/8/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 3/25/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 14 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Mike BostRepublican · Illinois
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Aaron BeanRepublican · Florida
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Earl CarterRepublican · Georgia
Mike CollinsRepublican · Georgia
Byron DonaldsRepublican · Florida
Ron EstesRepublican · Kansas
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
Brad FinstadRepublican · Minnesota
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Abraham HamadehRepublican · Arizona
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Mike RogersRepublican · Alabama
Guy ReschenthalerRepublican · Pennsylvania
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
William TimmonsRepublican · South Carolina
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey