Bill · H.R. 1941· House(119-HR-1941)
Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act
- Introduced
- 3/6/2025
- Last activity
- 3/6/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Joseph Morelle
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act," aims to prohibit the disclosure of intimate digital depictions. It amends the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2022 and the United States Code to establish legal consequences for such actions. The legislation creates a civil right of action for individuals whose intimate digital images are disclosed without consent. It also establishes criminal penalties for those who disclose or threaten to disclose such depictions with specific intent or knowledge. Additionally, it defines what constitutes an intimate digital depiction and the requirements for valid consent.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+7
The bill establishes strong legal protections for the privacy of an individual's intimate digital depictions.
Would children be better off under this?+6
The bill allows legal guardians to exercise rights on behalf of individuals under 18 regarding intimate digital depictions.
Does this give people more control over their personal data?+6
The bill protects an individual's digital likeness and sexual privacy by providing legal recourse against unauthorized digital manipulation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Empowers Victims of Digital Manipulation: Individuals who are the subject of non-consensual intimate digital depictions can bring civil actions against those who disclose them (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Provides Protection for Vulnerable Individuals: Legal guardians, family members, or court-appointed representatives can assume legal rights for individuals who are under 18, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Offers Financial Redress: Victims may recover monetary gains made by the defendant, actual damages (including emotional distress), liquidated damages of $150,000, or punitive damages (Section 2(d)(1)(A)).
-
Enables Removal of Content: Courts can issue temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions, or permanent injunctions to force a defendant to stop displaying or disclosing the imagery (Section 2(d)(1)(B)).
-
Protects Plaintiff Privacy: Courts have the authority to allow plaintiffs to use a pseudonym to maintain confidentiality during legal proceedings (Section 2(d)(2)).
-
Establishes Criminal Accountability: The bill creates criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment for up to 2 years (or up to 10 years in specific circumstances), for those who disclose or threaten to disclose these depictions with intent to harass or cause harm (Section 3(a)(1)-(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Limits Legal Recourse in Specific Cases: An individual cannot bring a civil action if the disclosure was made in good faith to law enforcement, as part of a legal proceeding, or as a matter of legitimate public interest (Section 2(e)).
-
Restricts Liability for Service Providers: Providers of interactive computer services cannot be held liable for voluntarily restricting access to intimate digital depictions in good faith (Section 2(h)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+6Good For Women+5
- Education And Technology
- Improves Data Privacy+6Increases Big Tech Regulation+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Privacy Rights+7
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Gender Equality+4
- 10/1/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/13/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/26/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/27/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/11/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/6/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Thomas KeanRepublican · New Jersey
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York
Frank MrvanDemocrat · Indiana
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey