Bill · H.R. 1788· House(119-HR-1788)
Fair Grocery Pricing Act
- Introduced
- 3/3/2025
- Last activity
- 3/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Maxwell Frost
- Cosponsors
- - 17 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Fair Grocery Pricing Act aims to stop food producers from using algorithmic systems to artificially raise prices or lower the supply of food. It prohibits food producers from contracting with "coordinators" who use software or data analytics to perform coordinating functions like analyzing pricing or recommending supply levels. The bill classifies such actions as a violation of the Sherman Act. Enforcement is granted to the Federal Trade Commission, the Attorney General, and State attorneys general. Additionally, it allows injured persons to bring civil actions to recover damages.
Yes· 3 of 11
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+6
The bill protects consumers from price-fixing and supply manipulation through increased enforcement and private right of action.
Does this put more rules on large technology companies?+4
The bill introduces new regulations specifically targeting the use of algorithms and data analytics for market coordination.
Is this likely to slow the rise in prices?+3
By prohibiting algorithmic price manipulation and supply reduction, the bill aims to curb artificial price increases for food products.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Prevention of Price Manipulation: The bill prohibits food producers from using algorithmic systems or "coordinators" to artificially inflate prices or reduce food supply (Section 3).
-
Empowerment of Injured Parties: Any person aggrieved by a violation of this Act can bring a civil action in a district court to recover damages (Section 4(b)(1)).
-
Financial Recovery for Victims: In successful civil actions, courts can award the plaintiff threefold the damages sustained plus reasonable litigation costs and attorney fees (Section 4(b)(2)(A)).
-
Protection Against Restricted Legal Rights: The Act ensures that if a person is injured by these violations, pre-dispute arbitration agreements or pre-dispute joint action waivers can be declared invalid or unenforceable (Section 4(b)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly listed within the text of the bill.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+6Reduces Inflation+3Improves Economic Growth+1
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Urban Residents+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+3Increase States Rights+2Improves Government Transparency+1
- Education And Technology
- Increases Big Tech Regulation+4
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- 10/28/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 3/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/6/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/4/2025
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
Sheila Cherfilus-McCormickDemocrat · Florida
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Jahana HayesDemocrat · Connecticut
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Mark PocanDemocrat · Wisconsin
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Lauren UnderwoodDemocrat · Illinois
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida